Mobile Safari Web Inspector on Safari on Mac.

If you tweak HTML and CSS and JavaScript on webpages, then you may appreciate how simple and convenient the plugin that goes by the name of Firebug for Firefox has made your life. I know it has for me. It is simply an indispensable piece of technology that I use every time I have to debug a CSS or HTML or JS issue on a webpage. Other browsers, notably Chrome and Safari, have built-in web inspectors which allow similar features.

I have of late been working on a lot of Mobile versions of websites, particularly those optimized for Mobile Safari and iOS devices using the fascinating jQuery Mobile framework. One of my biggest pet peeves while debugging issues on Mobile websites was not being able to debug the sites live on a mobile browser. More times than I’d care to acknowledge a particular mobile site, when viewed on a normal browser would look fine, but would have slight aberrations when viewed on a mobile browser. Those kind of issues are a real pain in the neck, because you are, more often than not, left to get sucked in an annoying cycle of wildly making changes in the HTML/CSS and refreshing the page on the mobile browser continuously in the hopes that the problem would fix itself.

However, today I bumped into a way to inspect and debug a mobile site on Mobile Safari by using Safari on a Mac computer (I am sure that it may work equally well for Safari on Windows, but I have not had reason nor occasion to try to find out). It not only works so well, but is also very straightforward to set up.

My testing environment includes an iPhone 4S running iOS 6 and a MacBook Pro running OS X Lion 10.7.5. Here are the steps you must follow in order to be able to inspect mobile web pages live via Safari on your Mac:

  • On your iOS device, turn on “Web Inspector” inside the Advanced settings for Safari. You’ll find these under the Settings app.
  • On the Advanced tab under Preferences for Safari on your Mac, you must check the “Show Develop menu in menu bar” setting.
  • Connect your iOS device to your Mac via the data cable.
  • You may now load on Mobile Safari the mobile webpage you want to inspect.
  • On Safari on Mac, open the Develop menu in the menu bar, select the name of your iOS device that will appear in the list, and click on the webpage shown on the pop-up that slides to the right.

The web inspector in Safari will kick in. You may explore the different tabs and functionality available there. The only downside is that no preview of the page is available on the inspector. Instead, the live page open on your Mobile Safari is the preview. You may go through the HTML source displayed inside the inspector, selecting the elements you want to inspect and notice that the corresponding elements are highlighted on the device. What’s more, you can also live edit the source as well as CSS, and they take effect almost immediately. How awesome is that!

Getting back inactive memory on Mac.

     OS X has the habit of keeping recently closed applications in memory so that if they are run again, they load quickly. The part of physical memory used for this purpose is called “Inactive memory”. The “System Memory” tab on the Activity Monitor application gives a break-down of the physical memory, including available free and inactive memory. Because of the way OS X behaves, you may or may not notice your system running low on “free” memory every now and then. This discovery could perplex you, because despite being low on free memory, you can load applications and go about doing your work. This is possible because inactive memory can be released by the OS X kernel’s memory management subsystem on demand. If it finds that the system is running short on free memory, and the user has started an application that is not already loaded in inactive memory, it will gladly comply and release enough of inactive memory to be able to run the requested application.

     I recently found a command line utility on OS X to release most of inactive memory. It is called, “purge”. The short description for “purge”, from its man page, states that its use forces the disk cache to be purged. The “disk cache” actually refers to “inactive memory”. To run this command, you have to type “purge” on (or any other Terminal application that you use). For example:

(Ayaz@mbp) [0] [~]
$ purge

     Before running the purge command, the memory breakdown on my system looked like:

     After the purge command ran, inactive memory went from 858MB down to 270MB.

     You will notice that the system becomes a little unresponsive while purge is flushing the disk cache. That’s fine and nothing to worry about.

     If you can’t find purge on your system, it could be because you have not installed XCode and accompanying development tools. These are available in one of the OS X installation discs. You can now also pay and download XCode from the Mac App Store.

     Have fun and be nice!

Converting a Git repo to Mercurial

     Until today, we had most of the projects on Mercurial repositories hosted on a Windows box in-house. The Mercurial web interface was set up to provide a convenient read-only access to both contributors and non-contributors within. However, the box in question was unreliable, and so was the Internet link it was alive on. And, in this world, there are few things more troublesome than having your source control server unavailable due to an unexpected downtime.

     What’s special about today is that we moved most of our Mercurial repositories to While they will remain private, the contributors as well as the internal non-contributors will be given access to them. Aside from having the repositories on a central server that we can mostly always rely on, having a lovely Web interface to browse and control the repositories, we also get useful goodies like issue trackers, wiki pages, and an easy user management interface. It is a win-win situation for everyone.

     One of the projects I was working on had only been on a local Git repository. I started work on it at a time when I found myself deeply in love with Git. Since BitBucket is a Mercurial repository warehouse, I had to find a way to convert or migrate the Git repository into a Mercurial one.

     I looked around on the Web and found a lot of people recommending the use of the HgGit plugin. As I understood it, this plugin made possible, among other things, the workflow that involved working on a Git repository and pushing the changesets to a Mercurial counterpart. However, the process of setting it up seemed rather complex to me. Plus, I didn’t want to keep the Git repository lying around when I was done with the migration. I wanted to be able to migrate the Git repository to a Mercurial one, push it upstream to BitBucket and make any changes in future in the source code by cloning from the Mercurial repository. What HgGit did seemed rather overkill for my needs.

     I then discovered the Mercurial ConvertExtension. This extension did just what I wanted: Convert repositories from a handful different SCMs into Mercurial. The process of converting a Git (or any other repository) to a Mercurial one through ConvertExtension is very straightforward.

     As a first step, you are required to edit your global .hgrc file to enable the extension thus:


     You are then required to run the hg convert command on your target Git repository thus:

$ hg convert /path/to/git/repo

     This will migrate the Git repository, and store it in the current directory inside a directory named repo-hg. Once inside the newly created Mercurial repository (and this part is important), you have to run the following command to checkout all the changesets:

$ hg checkout

     You may then push the repository with the usual hg push to BitBucket.


     PS: This blog post really helped get me going in the right direction.

Front Row glitch with Apple external keyboard

     MacOS has this application called Front Row. When activated, it takes over the entire screen, displaying what is known as the “10-foot user interface” to allow the user to kick back, relax, and watch and listen to videos, podcasts, music, or media content of any kind. If you’ve got a big screen, such as an Apple TV or an Apple cinema display (which if I may add are crazy expensive), with the aid of the Front Row application, you can enjoy a great media centre-esque experience.

     On MacOS, this application, Front Row, is tied to a keyboard shortcut: Command + Escape. Once activated, you can use the arrows keys to navigate your way through the 10-foot interface, selecting whatever media content you may want to look at. A really convenient feature of the Front Row application is its integration with the Apple remote. Essentially, you can sit back and navigate the media centre through nothing but the wireless remote.

     I’ve owned a MacBook for over two years now. Having used the keyboard on the MacBook for nearly all this time, I now find that I can barely type on it without causing myself a great deal of agitation. I’m a touch typist, and naturally when I cannot type both fast and accurate, and when I know for a fact that I can’t not because I don’t have the capacity to do so, but because the keyboard is being the bottleneck and standing in the way, I get frustrated very easily. This unfortunately happens to be the case with the MacBook keyboard now. In order to work around that temporarily, I recently dived without a clear head into a shopping spree and emptied my wallet into buying the Apple extended external keyboard. While it is not really conducive to touch typing (something I find it appropriate to elaborate on in a different article altogether), I am able to get by and get my work done without getting close to having a nervous breakdown.

     Now, here, I should point out that I don’t have substantial evidence to prove this (and to that end, I am groping around for it), but I suspect that the Front Row application and the external Apple keyboard don’t quite play nicely together. I am not a very media-centric person, in that, I am not altogether fond of watching movies so often as many of my friends do, for example, so I have little to no use of the Front Row application. However, since I do use all sorts of keyboard shortcuts to perform different functions across many esoteric applications (including Vim, use of which puts a lot of emphasis on the use of the Escape key), I somehow end up pressing the wrong key combination and activating Front Row unwittingly. But, that’s fine, you may say, because all I then have to do is close Front Row. Yes, well, sort of. My problem is that, with the external keyboard attached, if I accidentally start up Front Row and let it take over the screen, I am unable to exit it. And because the application itself does not have any UI elements that can be clicked at to command the application to quit and because the only keyboard shortcut that happens to be the only known (to me) means of exiting the application stops working in the presence of an external Apple keyboard, because of all that, I get a big problem in my hands. I get stuck with an application that essentially takes over my computer, and I can’t do anything about it. I’ve tried waiting for the screen saver to kick in, hoping that when I make the screen saver go away, I would get control back of my system; I’ve also tried letting the MacBook sleep and wake-up subsequently, but all in vain. The Front Row application simply doesn’t go away, until I am left with no other option but to forcefully reboot the MacBook, losing all my data inside all my running applications, which, I should mention, are functioning normally behind the nauseating Front Row screen.

     I’ve had this happen inadvertently far too many times for me to continue to ignore it. So, I eventually did the first thing I could think up of: Find a way to disable the keyboard shortcut. It turned out to be pretty easy to do. Most of the common keyboard shortcuts, as it turns out, linking to different common applications and actions are defined under the Keyboard Shortcuts section in Keyboard inside Preferences. The shortcut for the bloody Front Row is somewhere in there.

     I am pretty sure there’s something amiss with Front Row and its associated keyboard shortcuts when an external keyboard is attached, but as I said before, I’ve nothing to substantiate that claim. Right now, I am happy and relieved to be able to disable the shortcut.

Ranting about Mercurial (hg) (part 1)

     The day I got a grip of git, I fell in love with it. Yes, I am talking about the famous distributed version control application: git. I was a happy Subversion (svn) user before discovering git. The day to day workflow with git and the way git worked made me hate Subversion. I was totally head over heels in love with git.

     I have come to a point where the first thing I do when I am about to start a new project is to start a git repository for that project. Why? Because it is so easy and conveneient to do. I really like the git workflow and the little tools that come with it. I know that people who complain about git often lament about its lack of good, proper GUI front-ends. While the state of GUI front-ends for git has improved incredibly and drastically over the years, I consider myself a happy command-line user of git. All my interactions with git happen on the command-line. And, I will admit, it does not slow me down or hinder my progress or limit me in any way in what I do. I have managed fairly large projects on git from the command-line, and let me tell you, if you are not afraid of working on the command-line, it is extremely manageable. However, I understand that a lot of people run away from the command-line as if it were the plague. For those people, there are some really good git GUI front-ends available.

     I have to admit that for someone coming from no version control background or centralized version control background (such as Subversion or CVS), the learning curve to git could turn out to be a litle steep. I know that it was for me, especially when it came to getting to grips with concepts involving pushing, pulling, rebasing, merging, etc. I don’t think I will be off-base here to think that a good number of people who use version control software for fairly basic tasks are afraid of merge conflicts in code when collaborating code. I know I was always afraid of it, until I actually finally faced a merge conflict for the first time. That was the last time I felt afraid of it, because I was surprised to find out how easy it was to deal with and (possibly) resolve merge conflicts. There’s no rocket science to it.

     I have been plenty impressed with git that I wince when I am forced to use any other version control. In fact, I refuse to use Subversion, as an example, and try my best to convince people to move to git. Why? Because git is just that good. I should probably point the reader to this lovely article that puts down severals reasons that explain why git is better that a number of other popular version control applications out there.

     Recently, at work, I have had to deal with the beast they call Mercurial (hg). Yes, it is another famous distributed version control system out there. I was furious at the decision of my peers to select Mercurial for work-related use, and tried my best to convince them to use git instead, but they didn’t give in to my attempts to persaude them. I had no choice but to unwilling embrace the beast and work with it.

     Instantly, I had big gripes with the way Mercurial worked as well as its general workflow. Where I fell in love with how git tracked content and not files, I hated the fact that Mercurial only tracked files. What I mean by that is if you add a file in a Mercurial repository to be tracked and commit it, and then make any changes to the file, Mercurial would automatically add it to the staging commit. Yes, it wouldn’t let you specify manually which files that were changed should be part of the staging commit, something that git does. A staging commit is a staging area where files that have been changed and have been selected to be part of the next commit are loaded to be ready for commit. With git, you have to manually specify which file to add to the staging commit. And I loved doing it that way. With Mercurial, this was done automatically. This in turn brings me to the second big gripe I had with Mercurial: incremental commits. Git workflow places an indirect emphasis on incremental commits. What are incremental commits? In the version control world, it is considered best practice to perform a commit that is as small as possible and that does not break any existing functionality. So, if for example, you have made changes to ten files to add five different functionalities, that may be independent of each other, but would only like to commit one functionality at a time. That is where incremental commits come in action. With incremental commits, you specify only the files you want to be committed and commit them, instead of committing all the changed files in a bunch and add a general purpose commit message. Incremental commits is a big win for me, and I adore that feature. Because with git you had to manually specify which of the changed files you wanted in the staging commit area, incremental commits came easily and naturally. With Mercurial, where it automatically added all changes to tracked files into the staging commit area, it did not.

     So I asked the obvious question: How do we do incremental commits with Mercurial? Aftering sifting through the logs, I found out that it was indeed possible, but in a very ugly way. The Mercurial commit command takes an extra parameter, -I, that can be used to specify which files explicity to make part of the commit. But that wasn’t it. If you had, say, five files of the ten changed files you wanted to commit, you would have to tag the -I switch behind each of those files, otherwise, Mercurial will fail to include the files in the commit. To this day, this little quirk bites me every now and then.

     I will admit that the one thing I really liked about Mercurial was the built-in web server it came with that could provide a web-based interface to your Mercurial repositories for viewing. This was something that was missing from or quite difficult to do with git. And, this was also one of the biggest reasons why my peers at work decided to go with Mercurial for. They all wanted a convenient way to access the repositories over the web.

To be continued.

Jagged fonts on Snow Leopard on LCD over DVI

     I have a 13″ white MacBook. It has a glossy display that is about the best I have ever used in my life. Great quality, lovely fonts. The only drawback with it is a drawback with glossy displays: it reflects ambiant light which can at times cause problems. But I really don’t mind that. I can work around it easily. Overall, I am really happy with the display on the MacBook.

     The only problem is, 13″ is just not enough. Not all the time. But when you are managing many things side by side, and not least when writing code, you can really get frustrated from not having enough space on the screen. After all, it doesn’t help that you’ve windows hiding behind your current window in focus because there is no space left anywhere on the screen to toss two or three windows side-by-side and still be able to get anything done.

     So, a year ago, I purchased, after careful thought and research, a ViewSonic VX1940w external LCD. The reason I settled on this one, and not any other, is a combination of: a) great price I was getting on it; b) excellent resolution it was offering at that price; c) it sported both VGA and DVI inputs. I really, really wanted an LCD with a DVI input. If you haven’t clicked on the LCD catalog page, this LCD sports a max resolution of 1680×1050 and is 19″ in size and wide-screen. It has a matte display, in that, it does not have the reflection problem the glossy displays suffer from. But it isn’t nearly so crisp in display quality as the glossy.

     If you’ve had the occasion to use any Mac laptop, you’ll know that they don’t have the de facto VGA and DVI input/output ports. Instead they can have any one of mini-DVI, mini-VGA, mini-DisplayPort, or micro-DVI/VGA ports, which by the way are all Apple proprietary stuff. So, how do you connect almost all of the LCDs out there that come with standard VGA and DVI ports and connector wires? You buy VGA and/or DVI adpaters from Apple. These, I should mention, are anything but cheap.

     Naturally, I wanted to buy the DVI adapter for my MacBook. However, I did some research and found bad news in that, a lot of people on the Mac forums reported their LCDs not working with the DVI adapters Apple provides because of the latter being either DVI-I or DVI-D, and most LCDs not supporting one or the other. That scared me. The DVI adapter was expensive to being with, I was not sure whether it would really work with my LCD. So, I took the safe lane out and bought the VGA adapter. And it worked out of the box.

     But, there were problems. These were the sort of problems I documented in a question titled, “Why do I feel a strain on my eyes when I look at the 19″ matte display?“, that I asked on the Super User forum. You may want to skim through it to get the excruciating details of the problems I faced with the VGA display on the LCD. The bottom-line was that that I was told that I had to get the DVI adapter instead, and that because of the jagged fonts on the VGA display and generally sub-standard picture quality, my eyes were having a hard time adjusting, resulting in strain and headache. Initially, it didn’t make sense to me how that could really be the cause of the problem, and didn’t buy it. But, the fact remained that I couldn’t use the LCD for long without walking off with an incredible burden weighing down on my eyes.

     Finally, I bit the bullet today and bought a mini-DVI to DVI adapter. Having plugged it in, I noticed that the “auto image adjust” functionality on the LCD was disabled. It wasn’t when the VGA was plugged in. Despite changing a couple of settings that I thought might make a difference, I felt that the fonts looked even more jagged, the picture quality worse than before. Having spent some more time staring on the screen, opening up Terminals and editors and windows, I realized it wasn’t merely a feeling. The fonts and the display did look much worse than before. I freaked out. I didn’t know what to do. I rebooted the MacBook in the hopes that when I plug in the LCD again, I will actually surprise myself. To my utter dismay, nothing changed. I was sorely disappointed, and I didn’t know what to do. A feeling of remorse hit me for having spent a fortune on the DVI adapter only to get a crappier picture than I did on VGA.

     With a heavy heart, I started looking around. I skimmed with grief through a couple of similar posts on the forums about how fonts on DVI input on LCD looked jagged, and such. Nothing suggested really helped. And then, I found this blog post, Snow Leopard Font Smoothing. It talked about the exact same problem I was having. And what’s more, it suggested a fix for the problem. The fix was to toggle a global setting on OS X by running the following command on the

defaults -currentHost write -globalDomain AppleFontSmoothing -int 2

     I did this, but nothing worked. I wasn’t really sure what else I had to do to get this to work, neither did the blog post hinted at anything beyond running that command. After a while, I was convinced that there was no hope for me in this. I had nearly given up when I noticed the fonts on the text on the menu bar. It looked different. It was crisper, better, more beautiful. And then it hit me. I quickly, first of all, quit my, and when I re-opened it, voila! There they were. The lovely fonts I had fallen in love with on the MacBook screen. I restarted one by one most of the applications. Apparently, what little helpful bit that blog post missed out on was that you had to close all your applications and re-run them for the settings to take effect. I imagine an easier way is to simply log off and log back in.

     I am absolutely ecstatic with all this. Not only can I use my big LCD to manage my work in a better and more productive manner, I don’t have to walk away with unbearable headaches and eye-strain. Well, I still have headache and eye-strain, to be honest, but that’s an every-day thing. I am so happy.

Using mouse inside Vim on

     When I am writing code, I spend most of my time inside Vim on on MacOS. When I am not writing code, I still end up spending a good bit of my time on, running all sorts of commands, using command-line applications (such as irssi for IRC), and editing files in Vim here and there.

     Coming from Linux, my biggest gripe with Vim on has been the fact that I could not scroll through the Vim window using the wheel on my mouse as I would any normal editor. If I tried to scroll up or down, would scroll through the Terminal session instead and mess everything up. For a long time, I had to contend myself with holding down the Fn and Shift keys and using the Up and Down arrows to scroll back and forth. Anyone who has done this can immediately imagine how annoying this can get.

     So, the other day I had a thought cross my mind and I asked myself, “Vim can’t really be that lame and not support the functionality of scrolling with the mouse properly. I am simply missing out on something.” I looked around, and sure enough, I found that Vim does support all sorts of mouse-related operations on the shell, including properly scrolling up and down. This particular feature of Vim is toggled via the “:set mouse=a” setting. You could go through the help menu, with “:help mouse” inside a Vim session, to see what other values, apart from “a”, that setting can take. But for all intents and purposes, the “a” setting is sufficient.

     I was happy Vim could do that. But, when I toggled it in Vim on, it didn’t work. Scrolling, as before, would only scroll through the buffer and mess up things. I was disappointed.

     Sifting through a couple more threads here and there on the web about Vim, scroll, and, I was able to figure out the reason why, after enabling mouse support on Vim, it didn’t work on As it turns out, eats away all the mouse gestures thrown at it, and does not delegate them to Vim or other applications running within the shell. It doesn’t let them through. Vim wasn’t getting any mouse gestures at all. This was a problem. I thought I had bumped into a big, thick wall that could not be crossed.

     But, I was wrong. Luckily, I somehow managed to find a plugin, by the name of Mouse Term, for that patched’s behaviour of masking mouse gestures and not letting them through to individual applications. Mouse Term, as is mentioned on its home page, requires another, small application, SIMBL, to be installed first to work. In fact, Mouse Term is a SIMBL plugin.

     Once I had SIMBL and then Mouse Term installed and loaded, I could actually scroll through Vim, with the “:set mouse=a” setting, prefectly. Not only that, I noticed something else as well that made me so happy. I use tabs in Vim. Vim makes available half a dozen Vim commands, that start with the prefex “:tab”, to manipulate tabs, navigate through them, etc. If you’ve ever used tabs seriously on Vim, and used these commands to cycle through tabs, for example, you’d understand how frustrating it can get. But, guess what my excitement was about? Not only could I now scroll through a Vim window smoothly, I could also click on the tabs to switch to them. I could also click on the “X” on the top right corner to close a tab. It simply worked.

     The best part is when you have the NERD Tree Vim plugin installed. You can, inside the NERD Tree window, expand and collapse directories and open files simply at the click or double click of the mouse. As a Vim user, what more could you want?