Guide: Deploying on IIS7 using PyISAPIe

I spent the last week travailing away, trying to painfully find a way to deploy a based API on IIS7 using PyISAPIe. As frustrations had begun to mount up, I had nearly decided to give up. Being a die-hard Linux and Mac guy, I despise having to work on Windows. Here I was, not only forced to work on Windows, but to find a solution for a problem that left no leaves unturned in its effort to drive me crazy. As if someone decided all this misery wasn’t quite enough, I had to work with a remote desktop session in order to research, tweak, bang my head, and get things to work. Eventually, I cut through massive frustration and despair, managing to find a satisfactory solution. I almost danced in excitment and relief, letting out all sorts of expletives directed at Windows in general and IIS in particular.

To get back to the important question of deploying a script on IIS7 using PyISAPIe, I will make it such that this guide will list down various steps I took, including snippets of relevant code I changed, to tame the beast. I can only hope that what is below will help a poor, miserable soul looking for help as I did (and found none).

I worked with PyISAPIe because I had successfully deployed multiple Django websites on IIS7 on it. The script in question was going to be a part of another Django website (though acting independently). It only made sense to use PyISAPIe for it as well.

First and foremost, I had to install the module on the system. Having had trouble before with IIS with installed through easy_install, I decided to be safe and installed it from source.. Getting to work with PyISAPIe required a small hack (I notice I may make it sound as though it all came down to me in a dream, but in reality, it took me days to figure it out, and clearly after much anguish and pain). In the file Lib\site-packages\web\ lies the following function:

def _is_dev_mode():
    # quick hack to check if the program is running in dev mode.
    if os.environ.has_key('SERVER_SOFTWARE') \
        or os.environ.has_key('PHP_FCGI_CHILDREN') \
        or 'fcgi' in sys.argv or 'fastcgi' in sys.argv \
        or 'mod_wsgi' in sys.argv:
            return False
    return True

In its pristine state, when is imported from a source file through PyISAPIe, an exception is thrown. The exception, while I don’t have the exact message, is about it complaining about sys.argv not having an attribute argv, which reads fishy. Since the function _is_dev_mode() only checks whether is being run in development mode, I thought I didn’t care about it since I wanted everything to run in production mode. I edited the function such that its body would be bypassed, while it returned a False boolean value. It looked like this (the important changes I made are highlighted):

def _is_dev_mode():
    return False
    # quick hack to check if the program is running in dev mode.
    if os.environ.has_key('SERVER_SOFTWARE') \
        or os.environ.has_key('PHP_FCGI_CHILDREN') \
        or 'fcgi' in sys.argv or 'fastcgi' in sys.argv \
        or 'mod_wsgi' in sys.argv:
            return False
    return True

This innocuous little addition did away with the exception.

Next up, I used default Hello World-esque example of found on their site to test the deployment (of course, I went on to use my original API script, which was far too complex to trim down and fit into as an example). I called it (I placed it inside the folder C:\websites\myproject). It looked like this:

  import web
  urls = (
      '/.*', 'hello',
  class hello:
      def GET(self):
          return "Hello, world."
  application = web.application(urls, globals()).wsgifunc()

It was pretty simple. You have to pay particular attention on the call to web.application. I called the wsgifunc() to return a WSGI-compatible function to boot the application. I prefer WSGI.

I set up a website under IIS using the IIS Management Console. Since I was working on a 64-bit server edition of Windows and had chosen to use 32-bit version of Python and all modules, I made sure to enable 32-bit support for the application pool being used for the website. This was important.

I decided to keep the PyISAPIe folder inside the folder where rested. This PyISAPIe folder contained, of import, the PyISAPIe.dll file, and the Http folder. Inside the Http folder, I placed the most important file of all: the That file could be thought of as the starting point for each request that is made, what glues the Request to the proper Handler and code. I worked with the Examples\WSGI\ available as part of PyISAPIe. I tweaked the file to look like this:

from Http.WSGI import RunWSGI
from Http import Env
#from md5 import md5
from hashlib import md5
import imp
import os
import sys
from code import application
ScriptHandlers = {
	"/api/": application,
def RunScript(Path):
  global ScriptHandlers
    # attempt to call an already-loaded request function.
    return ScriptHandlers[Path]()
  except KeyError:
    # uses the script path's md5 hash to ensure a unique
    # name - not the best way to do it, but it keeps
    # undesired characters out of the name that will
    # mess up the loading.
    Name = '__'+md5(Path).hexdigest().upper()
    ScriptHandlers[Path] = \
      imp.load_source(Name, Env.SCRIPT_TRANSLATED).Request
    return ScriptHandlers[Path]()
# URL prefixes to map to the roots of each application.
Apps = {
  "/api/" : lambda P: RunWSGI(application),
# The main request handler.
def Request():
  # Might be better to do some caching here?
  Name = Env.SCRIPT_NAME
  # Apps might be better off as a tuple-of-tuples,
  # but for the sake of representation I leave it
  # as a dict.
  for App, Handler in Apps.items():
    if Name.startswith(App):
      return Handler(Name)
  # Cause 500 error: there should be a 404 handler, eh?
  raise Exception, "Handler not found."

The important bits to note in the above code are the following:

  • I import application from my code module. I set the PATH to include the directory in which the file is so that the import statement does not complain. (I’ve to admit that the idea of import application and feeding it into RunWSGI came to while I was in the loo.)
  • I defined a script handler which matches the URL prefix I want to associate with my script. (In hindsight, this isn’t necessary, as the RunScript() is not being used in this example).
  • In the Apps dictionary, I again route the URL prefix to the lambda function which actually calls the `RunWSGI` function and feeds it application.
  • I also imported the md5 function from the hashlib module instead of the md5 module as originally defined in the file. This was because Python complained about md5 module being deprecated and suggested instead of use hashlib.

And that’s pretty much it. It worked. I couldn’t believe what I saw on the browser in front of me. I danced around my room (while hurling all kinds of expletives).

There’s a caveat though. If you have specific URLs in your script, as I did in my API script, you will have to modify each of those URLs are add the /api/ prefix to them (or whatever URL prefix you set in the Without that, will not match any URLs in the file.

What a nightmare! I hope this guide serves to help others.

Thank you for reading. Good bye!

PS: If you want to avoid using PyISAPIe, there is a simpler way of deploying on IIS. It is documented crudely over here.

Debugging Django applications!

When developing Django applications, there can be many times when you would want to roll up your sleeves and get your hands dirty. You may want to know, for example, why the control isn’t falling into a certain block of code, what values are being returned to the view from the browser or test client, why a certain form is bailing out on you, or any manner of possible problematic scenarios. For these and many more, there are a number of things you can do to help yourself and your code. I am going to describe a couple of those that I frequently employ.

1. Quick and dirty debugging

Yes! It is the quickest, dirtiest, and easiest form of debugging that has been around since who knows when. Like with many other programming languages, it takes the form of Python print statements for Django. It is really helpful when you are running your Django applications off of the Django development server, where the print output make their way to the console from which the development server is run.

2. Python Logging framework

The Logging framework for Python is as easy to use as they come. The use of the logging framework resembles to some extent quick and dirty debugging, but goes much further in terms of the flexibility as well as the levels of sophistication it provides. The simplest and quickest use is to import the logging module in the file carrying the code you want to debug, and use any of the available log message creation methods: debug(), info(), warning(), error(), etc. The output from these methods will make their way to the console where the development server is running.

With the default settings, however, the logged messages do not provide useful information beyond what you tell them to print. Also, you have no control over where the messages end up showing. So, say, if you are running your Django project over Apache with mod_python or mod_wsgi, you may be up a stump trying to locate where the messages go, or you may want to keep the messages aloof in a different file, but will find that the default settings for the logging framework won’t be able to lend you much room to breathe.

However, that is where the Logging framework really shines. It is configurable to a great extent. The docs for the framework give detailed information about the different nuts and bolts of the framework and the different ways in which it can be tuned. For the sake of this article, I will briefly brush over a slightly basic configuration that I use the logging framework in when debugging Django applications. I simply create a basic configuration setting for the logger, and move it into the file for the Django project. It looks like this:

import logging
  format='%(asctime)s %(funcName)s %(levelname)-8s %(message)s',
  datefmt='%a, %d %b %Y %H:%M:%S',
  filename='/tmp/project.log', filemode='w')

Not only does this separate the log messages to the file /tmp/project.log, it also adds useful debugging information to the start of each logged message. In this particular case, the date and time, the name of the function from which the logging method was called, the logging level, and the actual message passed are displayed. All these and much more are thoroughly documented with elaborate examples in the documentation for the logging module.

3. The Python Debugger (pdb)

You may probably already have used the pdb module before for debugging Python scripts. If you have not figured out already, you can just as easily use pdb to debug your Django applications.

If you are like me, you may have got into the habit of writing unit tests prior to writing down Django views that the unit tests test. It is a wonderful habit, but it can get unnerving at times when you are writing your tests first. This is primarily because of the way the unit tests interact with your code: Once written, they run in their entirety without any form of interaction from the user. If any number of tests fail, the fact is made clear at the conclusion of the test runner. What I want to say is that there is no easy way for you to interact when the tests are being run.

With pdb, you can have a moment to sit back and take a sigh of relief. By importing the pdb module, and calling the pdb.set_trace() method right before the point where you want to start to debug your code, you can force the test runner to freeze itself and drop to the familiar, friendly pdb prompt. This helps immensely when you want to find out, for example, why a form that you are unit testing is not validating, what error messages it is receiving, what errors or outputs it should produce so that your tests can simulate those, etc. Once at the pdb prompt, you may use the usual lot of pdb commands to inspect and step through the code.

The use of pdb, however, it not restricted to unit testing. It may equally well be used when serving your Django applications over the development server. However, there is one little detail that needs to be accounted for. When you want to debug your Django applications over the development server with pdb, you must start the development server with these additional switches:

$ python -m pdb runserver --noreload

The -m pdb switch is documented in the documentation for the pdb module. Simply, it makes sure that if the program being debugged burps and crashes (either owning to an error, or when stimulated such as by calling the pdb.set_trace() method), the pdb module automatically falls flat on its face and activates the post-mortem debugger. This is very convenient, because what it means is that the friendly pdb prompt shows up, and you can dissect the code from that point onwards.

The --noreload switch to the runserver command, however, is crucial. The Django development server is designed to automatically reload the Python interpreter if there’s a crash or error of some sort, or to reread all the Django files if there has been a change in any one of those. One fallout of this default behaviour of the development server is that since the Python interpreter is reloaded, all previous context is lost, and therefore, there is no way for pdb to save face. The --noreload switch, therefore, forces the Django server to stray off of its default behaviour.

With the development server running with these switches, all you have to do is make sure you have placed calls to pdb.set_trace() method in your code where you want to break out. And that’s as easy as it gets.

I hope that what I have described finds its way into the useful bucket of my readers. For now, that’s all. I hope you do enjoy, if you did not before, debugging your Django applications after reading this article. Please, stay safe, and good bye!

A guide to configuring two different Django versions for development

Django 0.9x and Django 1.x branches are so far apart that a project built on top of the former, not least when it has been rolled off into production, that porting it to the 1.x branch of Django can easily escalate into a nightmare. If you have to maintain a legacy Django project — I choose to call projects built on anything before 1.x legacy –, you will find that it is easier if you maintain two different versions of Django on your development environment. How do you do that, is the quagmire this post revolves around.

I prefer Apache with mod_python to Django’s simplistic development web-server for Django projects. Initially, the task of setting up mod_python and Apache to your tastes may seem daunting. However, once you get around its not so steep curve, the difficult task becomes second nature.

I am working with Python 2.5 on a project with Django 1.0.2. Django is deployed on the system in the site-wide default directory for third-party Python modules and applications. I also have to support development for a legacy application built on Django 0.97 (a trunk snapshot from a time long ago). My requirement is simple: I want to be able to run both projects simultaneously without having to muck around tweaking configurations besides the one time when I set the projects up.

A garden-variety solution is to change the default Django directory in the Python path to point to the specific Django that is the need of the moment. This approach puts upfront a limitation of not being able to run both projects side by side. It also is annoying because it requires tap-dancing around Django directories when switching between the two versions. It is not a considerable blow to productivity, but if it can be avoided for a better, more efficient solution, there is no reason not to.

The solution I am proposing involves having the recent Django set up as the default, with the legacy Django installed in a different directory—after all, the legacy Django is the odd item of the group. I develop on an OS X environment, where I have the two Django versions set up thus:


You can probably tell which is which.

I have both projects deployed as virtual hosts on Apache, each running off of the root of the web-server without stepping on the feet of the other. They can easily instead be set up to, instead of the root of the web-server, serve from under a unique sub-URL path. That is mostly a matter of preference.

For each virtual host, I have assigned a domain name based off of the name of the project. I should emphatically point out that these domains are set up to resolve to localhost on my system. They may likely have real world twins that are routable over the Internet, but for all intents and purposes, they are local to my development environment. I have done it so, partly out of convenience, and partly because one of the projects hinges on subdomain-based user-to-account mapping (what this means, simply, is that registered users on the project are assigned different accounts that directly relate to subdomains, and can log in to the project only via their respective subdomains) for proper functioning. For the latter, the domain based approach was inevitable.

With that in mind, here are the virtual host settings for the two projects

<VirtualHost *:80>
   ServerAdmin root@localhost
   <Location "/">
      SetHandler python-program
      PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
      SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE projectone.settings
      PythonPath "['/Users/ayaz/Work/', 
            '/Users/ayaz/Work/projectone/'] + sys.path"
      PythonDebug On

<VirtualHost *:80>
   ServerAdmin root@localhost
   <Location "/">
      SetHandler python-program
      PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
      SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE legacyproject.settings
      PythonPath "['/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django-0.97', 
            '/Users/ayaz/Work/', '/Users/ayaz/Work/legacyproject/'] + sys.path"
      PythonDebug On

While each line of the above is important, the following is the highlight of this post:

   PythonPath "['/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django-0.97', 
            '/Users/ayaz/Work/', '/Users/ayaz/Work/legacyproject/'] + sys.path"

I have effectively injected the path to Django 0.97 into Python path. What this helps achieve is that when mod_python loads the Python interpreter to serve an incoming request for the project, Python analyses its path, looking for a module named django. The first successful match is under the /django-0.97 directory, which, if I have not already lulled you into sleep, is where Django 0.97 lives.

For the curious, all possible mod_python directives are documented here.

All this is a one-time headache: you pop in a pill, and forget about it. I can now type in or in the browser to get to either project.

I should mention, still and all, that I have of late come to know of virtualenv, a Virtual Python Environment builder. It may be a more proper solution than what I have proposed, but I have not yet used it myself to say more.

I hope I was able to clearly explain what I had intended to.